| Remarques - Messages |
|
|
Office:
CA Date:
26-Oct-12
|
| CA approves Annex 52. |
|
Office:
JP Date:
22-Oct-12
|
| "is" is missing in "Special rules..." of 41/293. Otherwise, JP approves Annex 48. |
|
Office:
FR Date:
01-Oct-12
|
| FR approuve l'annexe 46. |
|
Office:
CA Date:
01-Oct-12
|
| CA approuve l'Annexe 46. |
|
Office:
IB Date:
20-Sep-12
|
| Thanks for preparing FV of definitions. Prompt consolidated versions(E&F) and e-approvals would be greatly appreciated for IPC-2013 publication. Thank you. |
|
Office:
US Date:
13-Jul-12
|
| US has added annex 41, which addresses open issues with the definitions identified in recent annexes from the IB, FR, JP and CA. |
|
Office:
EP Date:
29-May-12
|
| Anx36 is the right one for French Version Definitions. Indeed Anx32 was for project A047. Apologies. -RI |
|
Office:
US Date:
25-May-12
|
| US agrees with CA. Annex 32 should be in Project A047. |
|
Office:
CA Date:
25-May-12
|
| Annex 32 should be in Project A047. |
|
Office:
US Date:
24-Feb-12
|
| Annex 28 has been added. It supplies a definition for H01L 41/29 in response to the invitation from the Working Group at IPC/WG/26. |
|
Office:
FR Date:
27-Jan-12
|
| FR approuve l'annexe 27. |
|
Office:
CA Date:
20-Jan-12
|
| CA approuve l'Annexe 27. |
|
Office:
IB Date:
11-Jan-12
|
| Ax.23-25 have been re-numbered since WG Decision posted on 30-NOV-11 was deleted and reposted on 13-DEC-11. Please note that IB has modified the number if the old one is used in these Annexes. Apologies for any inconvenience caused. |
|
Office:
EP Date:
10-Nov-11
|
| EP approves Annex 17 |
|
Office:
CA Date:
28-Oct-11
|
| CA approves Annex 17, but points out that the amendment to the title of the informative reference to H05K 3/00 (in Group H01L 41/311) was forgotten.
|
|
Office:
JP Date:
24-Oct-11
|
| JP supports Annexes 10, 12 and 17. |
|
Office:
EP Date:
15-Sep-11
|
| EP approves Annexes 10 and 12, but has some comments on Annex 11. |
|
Office:
CA Date:
03-Aug-11
|
| CA approves Annexes 10 and 12, but has some comments on Annex 11.
|
|
Office:
CA Date:
28-Oct-10
|
| CA supports the conclusions of the Rapporteur, as stated in Annex 3. It is presumed that the informative reference will be moved out of the scheme, once the project reaches the definition stage. |
|
Office:
JP Date:
01-Oct-10
|
| JP greatly thanks US for R-proposal of Annex 1. JP fully supports the scheme and the definitions presented. |